As we
think about the possibilities in education, one could look at his or her
classroom with a variety of options. For example, the frog doesn’t see doesn’t
visualize the world as we do. He can only perceive the world with four types of
phenomenons. The students in our classrooms or learning environments may also visualize
their world very differently than the presenter. The presenter must program the
learner to see what is being taught. The British neuropsychologis Richard
Gregory wrote, “ The senses do not give us a picture of the world directly;
rather they provide evidence for the checking of hypothesis about what lies
before us. (Richard 1990)
The text stated that we also feel more secure when we can
identify objects and determine their location. On sports fields, student athletes practice dozens of hours for every
hour spent in a game. (Aldrich 2009)
Alertness to danger, a clever strategic mind, an eye for assessing friend and
foe, a knack for judging strength and weakness, the know-how to take possession…
all are qualities that will safeguard us. (Text)
Who thought it would be possible to take a field, put three squares and home plate with a circle in the middle of a square and play a game? Someone visualized it and made it possible.
Aldrich, C. (2009). Learning Online with Games, Simulations,
and Virtual Worlds: Strategies for Online Instruction. 123
Richard L, Gregory, Eye and Brain: The Psychology of Seeing,
4th ed (Princeton University
Press 1990), 21-22
Wow, interesting way of putting how differently our students might be understanding even our classroom set up. Great observations (and research).
ReplyDelete